Unreviewed AI content is being demoted
Google's 2026 guidance draws the line at human oversight, not authorship. Sites publishing at volume with no review were hit hardest by the scaled content abuse crackdown.
Most AI SEO tools hand a model a keyword and publish whatever comes back. We read what already ranks first, check every draft against your own site, and track whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity actually name you.
SEO health score
Solid technical base. The gap is content depth and AI readiness.
We researched the incumbents before writing a line of code. These are the failure modes we designed around, not marketing angles.
Google's 2026 guidance draws the line at human oversight, not authorship. Sites publishing at volume with no review were hit hardest by the scaled content abuse crackdown.
Reciprocal networks are detectable by design. Search algorithms routinely nullify symmetric links, so you carry the penalty risk and collect none of the benefit.
Most autopilots ship no rank tracking, no indexation check and no AI-visibility data. You watch articles appear and take results on faith.
Handed nothing but a keyword, a model writes plausible filler about an industry rather than about you. It is the single most common complaint about tools in this category.
Everyone in this category does steps one and three. Step two is why the writing sounds like your business, and step four is what turns SEO from an act of faith into something you can check.
Give us your URL. We crawl every page, render the ones that build themselves in the browser, fingerprint your platform, and work out what you actually sell, what you don't, and who you compete with.
About 60 secondsWe show you our reading of your business and you fix it. What you sell, what you don't, your competitors. This is the part everything written later is held to, so it is worth two minutes.
You own the profileEach article starts by reading what currently ranks for that topic, so it has an angle those pages don't. Then seven checks run against your own site before it reaches you.
~2 minutes an articleApprove, edit or reject in the review queue. Then we track whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity start naming you for the questions your buyers ask.
Nothing ships without youEverything listed here is built and running. What is still coming is further down the page, named and dated as honestly as we can.
We crawl every page, including sites that build themselves in the browser, and score you across indexability, on-page, content, structure and AI readiness. You get a ranked list of what to fix and the page each problem sits on.
Every article starts by reading what currently ranks. That is where the angle comes from, and why the draft cites pages that exist today rather than repeating what a model already knew.
We work out the services you are adjacent to but do not offer, then check every draft against that list. No other tool in this category collects it.
Ask the questions your buyers ask, in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. See whether you get mentioned, who gets mentioned instead, and which topics you are missing entirely.
Grounding, length, answerable structure, overlap with your existing pages, repetition across your own articles, topic drift and house style. Nothing is hidden: you see every check and what it found.
We check GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and PerplexityBot against your robots.txt one by one, and validate your llms.txt if you have one.
Internal links are chosen from the pages our crawl saw return 200, so an article can never link to a URL that was invented.
Every draft lands in a review queue with its sources, its angle and its check results. Approve, edit or reject. Google's own line in 2026 is human oversight, and this is it.
Add as many sites as you run and switch between them. Each keeps its own audit, plan, articles and settings.
An honest comparison against how autopilot SEO tools typically ship today — including the last row, where they win and we do not.
| Capability | ScaleRank | Typical tool | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reads what currently ranks before writing | Yes | No | Most write from the topic alone |
| Knows what you don't sell, and stays out of it | Yes | No | Nobody else collects this |
| Human review before anything ships | Yes | No | Usually sold as a downside to remove |
| Shows you every quality check and what it found | Yes | No | Gates, where they exist, are invisible |
| AI-mention tracking across four engines | Yes | No | Marketed, seldom measured |
| Checks whether AI crawlers can reach you at all | Yes | No | |
| Reciprocal link exchange network | No | Yes | We consider this a liability |
| Public, flat pricing | Yes | No | Often gated and geo-varied |
| Publishes to your CMS automatically | No | Yes | Being built. Today you copy the Markdown |
“Typical tool” reflects the common feature set across widely used autopilot SEO products at comparable price points, based on their published documentation and pricing pages.
No gated quotes, no geo-varied pricing, no cancellation maze. Monthly billing, cancel whenever, and you keep everything we wrote for you.
For one site finding its footing.
For businesses that want compounding traffic.
For teams running SEO for clients.
Every plan starts with a free site analysis. No card, no account.
Including the ones our competitors would rather you didn't.
No. Google's policy is method-agnostic. It targets content published at volume with no oversight and no user value, whatever produced it. Their 2026 guidance draws the line at human review, which is exactly why we build review into the workflow instead of advertising its absence.
The common approach is a reciprocal network where customers link to each other. Search algorithms detect that symmetry and frequently nullify the authority, so you take on penalty risk for very little gain. There is a second problem too: when a core update hits the network, every customer in it is affected at once. We'd rather earn results through content quality and prove it with measurement.
Setup is about five minutes. After that, expect ten to fifteen minutes a week in the review queue. You can approve a batch in a few taps, edit anything that needs your voice, and reject what doesn't fit.
A full technical crawl scored across indexability, on-page SEO, content depth, site structure and AI readiness, plus a prioritized list of issues with specific fixes. No account or card required, and you can take the report and act on it yourself.
Not yet, and we would rather say so than imply otherwise. Approved articles come out as Markdown you paste into your CMS. WordPress publishing is what we are building next, followed by Shopify and Webflow. Everything else on this page is live today.
Today we measure the half nobody else does: we ask your buyers' questions in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and show you whether you get named, who gets named instead, and which topics you are absent from. Google-side measurement through Search Console, tracking each article's impressions, clicks and position, is next on the roadmap.
You keep it. Everything we write is yours on delivery, and cancelling doesn't require you to delete anything or forfeit past work.
Run the free analysis. You'll get a scored report and a prioritized fix list in about a minute, whether or not you ever become a customer.
We crawl the site you enter and score it. Nothing is published and no card is required.